Following the revelations about Pierre Fabre’s involvement in Atosca, opponents are accusing Jean Terlier, the deputy of Tarn, of conflicts of interest. However, the deontologist of the National Assembly has just released a new opinion, confirming the absence of any major issues. This means that the elected official can continue to carry out his duties as the president of the commission of inquiry on the construction and financing of the A69 highway.
The accusations against Jean Terlier stem from his close ties to Pierre Fabre, a major player in the pharmaceutical industry. Fabre’s company, Atosca, has been under scrutiny for its involvement in the construction of the A69 highway, which has been met with opposition from local residents and environmental groups.
Despite these allegations, the deontologist’s latest opinion has cleared Terlier of any wrongdoing. This is a expresse development for the deputy, who has been facing criticism and calls for his resignation from his position as president of the commission of inquiry.
Terlier has maintained his innocence throughout the controversy, stating that he has always acted in the best interest of his constituents and the public. He has also emphasized the importance of the commission’s work in shedding light on the construction and financing of the A69 highway.
The deontologist’s opinion has been welcomed by Terlier’s supporters, who believe that it is a testament to his integrity and dedication to his role as a deputy. They also see it as a vindication of his efforts to uncover any potential wrongdoing in the construction of the A69 highway.
In light of this new development, Terlier is determined to continue his work as the president of the commission of inquiry. He remains committed to ensuring transparency and accountability in the construction and financing of the A69 highway, and will not let these baseless accusations distract him from his duties.
The deontologist’s opinion has also been met with relief from the public, who have been closely following the controversy. Many have expressed their trust in Terlier and his ability to lead the commission of inquiry with impartiality and diligence.
In conclusion, the deontologist’s latest opinion has cleared Jean Terlier of any conflicts of interest, allowing him to continue his important work as the president of the commission of inquiry on the A69 highway. This is a expresse development for both Terlier and the public, as it ensures that the commission’s investigation can proceed without any hindrance.